|
|||||||||||||||||||||

| At a glance | |
| Product | ASUS RT-AC66U 802.11ac Dual-Band Wireless-AC1750 Gigabit Router [Website] |
| Summary | Broadcom-based simultaneous dual-band three-stream Draft 2.0 802.11ac router with USB drive and printer sharing and PPTP VPN server. |
| Pros | • Capable of very high three-stream N throughput • Supports router, AP, media bridge and WDS bridging/repeating • A pair of them can provide superior 5 GHz range |
| Cons | • Firmware still a work in progress |
Typical Price: $182 Compare Prices Check Amazon |
Introduction
Fans of ASUS' RT-N66U "Dark Knight" router have been chomping at the bit to know whether its first draft 802.11ac offering is a better choice. So let me cut to the chase and say that that the RT-AC66U is not the successor to the N66 that you are hoping for.
It's not that the AC66 is a bad router. It's just that it doesn't really provide enough benefit for most users (those with non-11ac devices) to outweigh the pain of its unstable firmware and higher price. Details, you say? Read on.
Physically, the AC66 is a dead ringer for its N66 sibling. If it were not for the labeling on the front and bottom panels, you would not be able to tell the difference between them. ASUS hasn't endowed the AC with a slick name either. Too bad, since I think "Dark Helmet" is available...
The callout diagram below taken from the User Manual shows the indicators, ports, connectors and switches, which are item-by-item the same as on the N version.
ASUS RT-AC66U panel callouts
As before, all ports are 10/100/1000 Mbps and there are two USB 2.0 ports for drive and printer sharing. A select number of USB WWAN modems are also supported that lets the router use 3G/4G networks as primary or backup internet sources.
ASUS seems to have a preference for 19V power supplies. The same diminutive wall-wart with its tiny connector plug used on the Dark Knight also powers the AC.
Inside
ASUS has delayed the release of internal photos, so I decided to open the AC up, even though I pretty much knew what was inside component-wise. Table 1 holds a summary of the AC66's key components along with those of the two other draft AC routers I've reviewed so far, NETGEAR's R6300 and Buffalo's WZR-D1800H and WLI-H4-D1300 bridge.
All three use the same Broadcom BCM4706 CPU. At 256 MB, the AC66U has double the memory of the other two routers, but the same amount of flash. The same 7 port Broadcom Gigabit switch is used in the Buffalo router, but NETGEAR opted for a smarter version.
| ASUS RT-AC66U | NETGEAR R6300 | Buffalo WZR-D1800H / WLI-H4-D1300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Broadcom BCM4706 | Broadcom BCM4706 | Broadcom BCM4706 |
| Switch | Broadcom BCM53125 | Broadcom BCM53115 | Broadcom BCM53125 |
| RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Flash | 128 MB | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| 2.4 GHz Radio | BCM4331 | - BCM4331 - SiGE SE2594L 802.11a/b/g/n WLAN Front End (x3) |
- BCM4331 - SiGE SE2594L (x3) |
| 5 GHz radio | - Broadcom BCM4360 - Skyworks SE5003L 5 GHz, 23dBm Power Amp w/ Power Detector (x3) |
- Broadcom BCM4360 - Skyworks SE5003L (x3) |
- Broadcom BCM4360 - Skyworks SE5003L (x3) |
Table 1: Component summary
The same Broadcom BCM4331/BCM4360 radio SoCs are used in all three products. But the ASUS is the only one of the three to use dual-band external antennas vs. six internal single-band. This means the external circuitry connecting the radio SoCs to the antennas is different. It looks like the Skyworks 5 GHz amplifiers made it into ASUS' design. But the SiGE 2.4 GHz RF front-ends in the NETGEAR and Buffalo routers are replaced by other, discrete components.
The AC66 is as similar to the N66 on the inside as it is on the outside—at least the way it is constructed. The photo below shows the same full-width heatsink used on the N66 that is thermally coupled via thermal pads to two RF shielded compartments below it.
ASUS RT-AC66U board top with heatsink
Slipping the assembly out of the case and flipping it over shows the bottom covered by a large plate similar to the one covering the N66's underside. I assume this plate serves as a heatsink since it was pretty warm, as was the outside bottom of the router.
ASUS RT-AC66U board bottom with plate
Removing the bottom plate revealed 128 MB of Samsung flash (K9F1G08U0D) and 2 MB of Macronix serial flash (25L1606E). There are no thermal pads connecting the plate to the board, so thermal connection must be made from board inner layers through the six metal standoffs that connect the plate to the board.
ASUS RT-AC66U board bottom without plate
It took some work to remove the top heatsink and pry off the tops of the two RF "cans" to get the photo below. But was worth it to see the construction details. The left-side can in the photo below holds the CPU, RAM and switch, while the right can houses the radios and their associated parts. The BCM4360 5 GHz radio is toward the top of the photo; the BCM4331 2.4 GHz radio is toward the bottom.
ASUS RT-AC66U board top without heatsink
User reviews
View all user reviewsAverage user rating from: 6 user(s)
NOTE! Please post product reviews from actual experience only.
Questions, review comments and opinions about products not based on actual use will not be published.
NOT STABLE !!
It's was a great router, but and there are a BIG but. It is not very stable. The first couple of weeks the range and speed are excellent. Then it suddenly begin to loose both range and speed, especially on the 5 GHz band, but there are also loads of examples that it has the same problem on the 2.4 GHz band.
One solution, for me at least, has been to restart the router every day.
Great router for LAN/WAN and wireless but issues with VoIP
I had lots of comments about the wireless range, how users could still be connected in the parking garage from the 5th floor. I couldn't use it, yet, because it appears to be performing PAT over NAT and I was trying to use it to support laptops, cell phones and a VoIP phone system with VoIP phones and one FXS device.
I opened my RTP ports at 10001-11001 but RTP traffic was coming in around 44K. As someone else stated, trying to get support is NIL. I've been talking to Joe from Taiwan and he really has an issue with English, there isn't support for it or he just doesn't know or care. He never answers my questions.
Ex.
ME: Joe, The Braeburn apples I got from you are not very tasty. Do you also sell Honey Crisp?
JOE: Get the new oranges and check back if you still have an issue.
My original question was can I disable PAT or do you recommend a different router for VoIP. His first response was, If you still have a problem, call Indiana after waiting 2 days for an email response but they're only open M-F. He replied on Saturday. Then he replied with update the firmware and then check back if that doesn't resolve the issue. What issue? I asked how to modify settings or recommend something geared towards VoIP devices, SIP traffic.
If you want a new technology router that does not involve SIP traffic, this is a very good router to have. I've tested it with Mac, Windows and Linux. There may be a way to use it for SIP traffic but currently, it's unknown to me. I originally purchased it for the new wireless technology, speed, range and QoS. All of those were as expected. High end ports being translated was the only issue I had.
Great router but does not see my Synology diskstation
The setup was very easy. It found my MacBook Pro and PC right out of the box but for some reason my 8TB of Synology storage is not seen at all. Can't figure this out over the weekend so I will be switching back to my AirPort Extreme until I get this figured out.
Can't make the media bridge perform
I like it a lot as a router, but can't get it to perform adequately as a media bridge. Having set up everything to default between the two RT-AC66Us, I can only reach 80 Mbps and that's way too low to even be considered as acceptable given the hype around it. I got 4 replacements before I gave up and the ASUS support had nothing more to throw at me. FYI, I used firmware versions 3.0.0.4.246, 3.0.0.4.260, 3.0.0.4.266. Currently using RT-AC66U with ASUS EA-N66 clients which give me about 120-200 Mbps.
Great router! It only needs DD-WRT or TomatoUSB Support!
Great router! It only needs DD-WRT or TomatoUSB Support! It already has RMerlin custom firmware, but there is need for more! For me, it was on par with Asus RT-N66U (identical design actually), but it has just one extra feature: 80211ac standard! Also known as Gigabit WiFi... and when you use that with another 80211ac WiFi card (or just another bridge), the speed is crazy! It's almost like you're on cable :)
Hope to see more improvements via the firmware updates...
Related Items:
ASUS RT-AC66U Wireless RetestCisco Linksys EA6500 Review - Part 2
ASUS RT-N66U and Linksys EA4500 / EA4200v2 Wireless Retest
NETGEAR R6300 Wireless Retest
Slideshow: Netgear WNDR3300 RangeMax Dual-Band Wireless N Router











