|At a glance|
|Product||NETGEAR WNDR4700 CENTRIA [Website]|
|Summary||Storage-centric Atheros-based "N900" abgn router with user-installable 3.5" internal drive, dual USB 3.0 ports and SD card slot.|
|Pros||• Supports WDS and AP modes|
• Dual USB 3.0 ports
• SD card slot
• User-installable SATA drive
|Cons||• Uneven wireless performance|
• No network activity indicators
• Much slower storage writes than reads
• Native internal drive format slower than NTFS
Typical Price: $130 Compare Prices Check Amazon
Updated 10/4/2012 - Added fan noise comment and links to final review
NETGEAR introduced the WNDR4700 Media Storage Router at CES back in January. Apparently, the marketing gurus thought it needed a sexier name before being sent out into the world to do marketshare battle. So it's now simply known as NETGEAR CENTRIA. (The NETGEAR marketing folks like their ALL CAPS, too, it seems.)
Since there has been a lot of interest in this product, I'm breaking the review into two parts. This First Look provides an overview of the product and internal details. It also covers wired routing and storage performance test results. The second article covers wireless performance and adds in some stress testing, for good measure.
The CENTRIA is a simultaneous dual-band three-stream N router, which is more commonly marketed as an "N900". This is because it can support client link rates up to 450 Mbps on both radios simultaneously if the radios are set to Auto 20/40 mode (NETGEAR calls this Up to 450 Mbps mode) and there are no competing networks in range on the 2.4 GHz band.
CENTRIA comes in two flavors—the WNDR4700 without an internal drive installed and the WNDR4720 with a 2 TB drive installed. The FCC ID internal photos show both WD Green (WD20EARX) and Seagate Barracuda (ST2000DM001) drives, which I'm guessing are what NETGEAR uses in the diskful CENTRIA version.
CENTRIA's physical design shares a lot with NETGEAR's R6300 draft 11ac router, measuring around 10 inches wide and a bit over 8 inches tall. The CENTRIA is a bit deeper than the R6300 (3.3" vs. 3.0"), however, to leave space for the full-sized 3.5" SATA drive it can store internally.
There are only Power, Internet, Wireless and USB and HDD status indicators on the front panel and no link or activity indicators for wired network traffic on either the front panel or rear panel switch ports. This move to no network activity indicators may increase the CENTRIA's WAF, but it is no help when it comes time to debug network problems.
CENTRIA rear view of ports and buttons
All ports are 10/100/1000 Mbps and there are two USB 3.0 ports--one on the rear and the other on the right side. And if you still don't have enough storage options, NETGEAR has also included an SD card slot. This should prove handy for quick digicam backups and moving media files to Android tablets and phones.
CENTRIA rear view of ports and buttons
Also like the R6300, CENTRIA is intended to sit on a table on its non-removable base with all Ethernet jacks on the bottom edge so that there is no danger of the router being pulled over by cable weight. The recessed area is still fairly narrow and fat-fingered folks may wrestle a bit with cable insertion and extraction.
As there was when the R6300 first shipped, there is no user manual for the CENTRIA as I write this. There is an install guide, however, which should tide you over until NETGEAR posts the UM.
NETGEAR is sticking with the "Genie" admin GUI first seen last fall on the WNDR3800. The screenshot below shows the Advanced Home page that, with the addition of Guest Network Status boxes, has sprouted scroll bars. I really wish NETGEAR would stop doing this and let us scroll the browser window to get to stuff that doesn't fit on a broswer page.
The screenshot shows the defaults that the router came up with, except that I let it upgrade from the V220.127.116.11 initial release factory firmware to the V18.104.22.168 shown. I was alerted to .32 by the CENTRIA's automatic update feature; the CENTRIA support page is still showing only V22.214.171.124.
I'm not going to review the CENTRIA's routing features, since they are standard NETGEAR Genie. If you need a walkthrough on the Genie feature set, Craig's feature review of the WNDR3800 should give you what you need.
Related Items:NETGEAR Shipping N900 Router With Lots O' Storage Options
NETGEAR WNDR4700 CENTRIA Reviewed
First Look: Cisco Linksys EA6500 Smart Wi-Fi Router AC 1750 HD Video P
Linksys EA6300 Advanced Multimedia AC1200 SMART Wi-Fi Wireless Router
Buffalo WZR-300HP AirStation HighPower N300 Gigabit Wireless Router Re
Average user rating from: 2 user(s)
NOTE! Please post product reviews from actual experience only.
Questions, review comments and opinions about products not based on actual use will not be published.
|User Rating [Back to Top]||Overall:||3.0||Features :||3.0||Performance :||3.0||Reliability :||3.0|
January 09, 2013
Report this review
I've bought this router 2 days ago and still regret this choice. I wouldn’t recommend this device to anybody. The fan is very noisy. The performance of the NAS is slow. Performance of the wireless is really hard to asses because it doesn’t work properly. 3 metres is a maximum distance without walls. Mac support is some kind of joke. You have to connect additional drive to USB first in order to use it with time machine. Think twice before you are going to spend 200$ for this device.
I had different results
September 29, 2012
Report this review
I currently have this router with the WD20EARX 2TB drive and with the drive empty, the first set of files had write speeds of nearly 40MB/s (though this was an older firmware)
Read speeds were nearly 90MB/s then when the drive became close to half full, the read and write speeds were nearly half of what they were when the drive was empty. It seems that the more files you add the slower it gets, for example, 2000 1MB files will slow it down more than a single 2GB file which it comes to subsequent reads and writes of new files added.
if possible try the initial release firmware or a different drive, and if possible try using a SSD to avoid any HDD bottlenecks